The United States, “Aviation Week” website November 24, 2009 published entitled “China’s commitment to a new type of advanced fighters,” the article, signed from the Washington, DC David A. Fulghum and from London, England Douglas Barrie. Articles pointed out, U.S. intelligence officials believe that China has received most of the U.S. stealth fighters how to build the necessary data, but the lack of integration of China’s aviation industry may be the key to a four-generation machine skills; The article also mentioned that the younger generation of Chinese aircraft performance, not necessarily comparable with the F-22, once mass production, the number of foreign experts, to be passed by “full consumption” tactics to suppress the U.S. military’s 187 F-22, eventually will be completely “consumed” the U.S. F -22 stealth fighter unit.
The article first said that Air Force officials and intelligence officials say China has the resources and technology to build a fourth-generation fighter aircraft. But China’s aviation industry may be a lack of key skills, this skill is to create an advanced fighter-jet maker with the West comparable to the performance fighter needs.
The article said, either in Beijing or the West’s defense sector, China still is not clear whether the technicians who really have the kind of engineering systems and capacities and capabilities of such systems is to achieve mass production of advanced weapons, aircraft and achieve the needed the performance of such advanced fighters to be similar to those aging B-2 stealth bombers and F-22 stealth fighter, or similar to the relatively new ability to some of the less stealthy F-35 “Lightning II” fighter. A U.S. Air Force officer, said: “(To build a new generation of fighter) you need to the appropriate shape, mechanical design, surface coating, aerodynamic performance and flight control systems integration together, although this is not magic, but there are a lot of skills on the inside. ”
The article mentioned the fact that there is no conclusion: The PLA Air Force would have to seek an optimum design of low detectability of the fighters, or in terms of performance, maintenance, carrying capacity and delivery schedule, the Air Force What are the requirements mentioned. US Office of Naval Intellig ence in 1997, China developed a new fighter called “J-XX”, this aircraft, or would seek a more “balanced” approach to achieve the stealth effect, and perhaps to focus on the front of the fan-shaped area radar reduction in cross-sectional area, or the use of appropriate coating to achieve stealth, rather than seeking full stealth design; the twin-engine, canard-delta wing concept had previously been recommended for the general design layout of new fighters.
“Aviation Week” website article goes on to say that China is unlikely that within 10 years to create a performance similar to the F-22 fighter aircraft platforms, although the recent news that China’s new fighter under development and will soon be to first flight. A U.S. intelligence official, the Chinese air force is also a senior analyst summed up the way the Chinese access to advanced technologies, he said: “In the legal, quasi-legal and illegal transfer of technology between, I believe that China has received most of the relevant How do we build stealth fighters and other aspects of architecture and materials, data, they also made full use of our open patent system, our public universities and research institutes, engineering, and we discuss the data in the academic … … “The article also mentioned that the growing the aging F-22 fighter jets and B-2 stealth bomber design is another factor, which gives China more than 20 years researchers time to catch up with these technologies. B-2 bomber, has also experienced its first service-life-extension program.
This U.S. intelligence official also said China from the United States, Japan, South Korea, Russia and the European Union all the way to obtain the necessary data, China’s R & D types of fighters and the only restriction being invested capital, and manufacturing process engineering and integration of integration the capacity of the various subsystems, these things Americans do best, and these skills truly reflect the group culture and the learning curve, not just readily available data, although similar to ISO 9000/9001/9002 systems and the standardization of software systems let “for” processing techniques has become much easier.
The article said that China’s F -10 fighter, performance similar to the US-made F-16, F -10 fighter plane engines, avionics systems, and aerodynamic performance is considered the best fighter on behalf of independent R & D efforts in China, this fighter in 2006 began a large-scale service. China spare parts for Boeing aircraft manufacturing and aviation materials and gain knowledge and skills development of China’s military aircraft have been helpful. The initial F -10 fighter R & D from Israel’s “lion” type fighter program benefits, but also by the Russian support.
The article also mentioned that China has also used from the Russian-made Su -27 “Flanker” fighter developed from the F-11B fighters, the F-11B as a platform for the introduction of Chinese self-developed avionics, fire control radar, weapons systems and power systems, and further repeated these subsystems for the F production appears to be-11B, may be intended for a specific J-XX project. F-11B fighter aircraft designed to be equipped with PL-12-type mid-range active radar-guided air to air missiles, rather than imported Russian-made R-77 (NATO called the AA-12 “Viper”). PL-12 air to air missiles, guided weapons development reflect China’s technology base has been fully upgrade, although the project was of great help in Russia.
U.S. intelligence officials said today, China’s real target is the face of an arms race in India, and in this process, the Chinese are winning. Although this competition has no direct impact to the U.S., but at least some of the Pentagon’s decision-makers believe that this will accelerate the pace of China’s strong military and war-making capacity, while the U.S. has been to focus on a limited response to the conflict of war and rebellion in military spending and technological development above. “In my view, we in the low-altitude low-speed MC-12 reconnaissance aircraft, MQ-1 / 9 unmanned aerial vehicles, C-27J transport aircraft and F-35 light fighter in billions of dollars in wasted costs,” that this intelligence Officials say so.
The United States, “Aviation Week” website article also quoted one pairs of F-22 fighter project has in-depth insight into the veteran fighter pilot as saying, (China) to build an advanced fighter aircraft, even though its performance can not be with the F-22 and F – 35 comparable, but if this aircraft has been substantial and sufficiently produced by complete consumption of tactics to suppress (the United States and) when the allied forces, then it will remain on the United States pose a serious threat to the stealth fighter unit. While an American aviation industry officials said, when those four-generation fighter with great quantity (advantage) trapped 187 U.S. F-22 was difficult, they will eventually be completely “consumed” the United States F-22 stealth fighter Force; if (China) them to the number of F-35 fighter planes to create an advanced, they do not have to be with the “Raptor” comparable to the performance.
The article also concluded that, for China, in 10 years leap forward in technology, creating a similar F-35 fighter is not impossible. And a U.S. Air Force senior officer said: “They (China) will be invested in something like that a lot of resources.”
replica tag watches
tiger woods watch
replica chanel j12 watch
fake watches
replica rolex watches
