Global Military

Global Military News and Report

Archive for category Observers

Indian media said that India will always be dangerous to live in the shadow of China

Sep 9

Posted by admin in India, Observers | Comments off

Sino Indian border Indian soldiers 300x199 Indian media said that India will always be dangerous to live in the shadow of ChinaIndian public opinion has hot Sino-Indian relations, which stress factors speculation. The following are excerpts related to the contents of report:

Indian media: India to deal with China that the “core interests”

Analysis of the Indian Institute of Defense Web site on September 3 article in question: China’s high-risk bets, India (Author: Su Yite – Dutta)

Be regarded as potential rivals for the country, the Chinese like to let the other party shall not be quiet. It is a way to deal with India in recent years to clearly reflect this. In general, this can be described as Sino-Indian relations since the founding of the People’s Republic in 1949 the theme. Beijing Declaration through this volatility: the world is not peaceful, that India is not the restoration of peace dismissed.

Northern Command B · S · panchashwar for visa indicates that China will continue to find new excuses can be made of India have been locked in conflict further complicated. At the same time, the PLA is in Pakistan-controlled Kashmir to strengthen road and railway construction, it seems that the Chinese did not think this is disputed areas.

New Delhi’s policy-makers clearly all. They have been downplayed over the past decade these issues in order to deepen the exchanges through the impact of the attitude of China’s most senior leaders, so that the rigid relations began to pick up. Unfortunately, it backfired.

If the liberal politicians think that, given the increasingly close trade relations between the two countries, trade volume reached 60 billion U.S. dollars – mainly exports to China, but also because of China’s construction, electricity and telecommunications companies have 25 billion U.S. dollars with India -300 100 million U.S. dollars in commercial contracts, China’s stance on key issues may be a slight relaxation, then they will be disappointed.

In the territorial dispute, China’s attitude is not the slightest concession. Dealing with international trade and environmental issues that officials have to pay if found on both sides form a “united front” of the foundation, I believe this will benefit the bilateral relationship, then they will be disappointed.

Many of China’s desire: it wants India to return “Arunachal Pradesh” (that I hid the South East – newspaper Note) – at least the Tawang and other areas; it wants India to Dalai Lama sent Back to Beijing, good for the Tibetans to suppress his freedom and the struggle of Tibet’s autonomy;

It would like to continue to occupy by force the occupation of Ladakh region of its; it wants to remain neutral in Nepal; it does not want close ties between India and the United States; it hopes to further open the Indian market, domestic enterprises; and so on.

It concludes that India has not done enough, and dissatisfaction, it will continue to put pressure on China:

It is opposed to India becoming a permanent member of UN Security Council to oppose the World Bank and International Monetary Fund as “Arunachal Pradesh” to provide loans for development projects,

It is hoped that India out of the East Asia process, which Pakistan denies India’s legitimate sovereignty over Kashmir, which the military stationed in Tibet, steadily building it through the pressure of maintaining strategic alliance with Pakistan.

India has two unilateral concessions to the Chinese. It first acknowledge that Taiwan is part of China, and then again did not seek concessions of its own territorial integrity of the case You Li accepted the Tibet part of China.

As the Chinese do not view them as concessions to India’s diplomatic stance that has not been any diplomatic rewards. India failed to give the Chinese recognition of India’s territorial order, recognition of Jammu and Kashmir and the northeastern border SAR (“Arunachal Pradesh”) owned all of India.

Although India has repeatedly reiterated that Tibet is part of China but did not receive any reciprocity from the Chinese, it does not help build confidence.

Nan of this, India must adjust the current strategy. As the importance of Sino-Indian relations, contacts and balance remains on the bilateral and regional stability. India also needs to show that its “core interests.” The need for more extensive measures to ensure that the dispute between the parties with a series of complex held extensive dialogue, eventually come to a solution.

India must insist on all diplomatic issues are the principle of reciprocity. Unilateral concession is of no use. In addition, India needs to improve relations with Taiwan-level, ministerial delegations invited to come for trade and investment negotiations.

India should be related to Southeast Asian countries – such as Indonesia, Vietnam, Philippines, Singapore – as well as Japan and the United States met to discuss parts of China in Asia’s arbitrary behavior, will help.

These countries are in a stable and harmonious China say one thing and worried about the issue.

Finally, in Beijing for “Arunachal Pradesh” and the Jammu and Kashmir as Indian territory, the Indian should stop claiming the Tibet Autonomous Region is part of China.

India-China relations to improve, maintain long-term stability is very important for India and Asia. But China also must have the same understanding.

India News: India, “the possibility of increasing the Cold War”

“Hindustan Times” website reported on September 5 issue: the question of Chinese privately India

Explore the views of India from China are usually bound to come from outside of China.

The Lu a document on the relations between India and China, the latest papers Hawaii Research Center on Asian security expert from India and China. View on how China, India, some of his views as follows:

China regards India as an irreconcilable social – religious divisions of land, with inherent instability and weak government leadership, can easily be contained by an agent, such view exacerbated tensions between the two countries .

Beijing to India’s rise as an economic and military power as the continued U.S. hegemony in Asia, hindered the end of U.S. hegemony in the Asia-Pacific region after the establishment of China-centric regional order.

China’s dominance in Asia, the long-term development depends on weak countries dependent on China. The goal has always been that confrontation between India and China.

China hopes India may pose any potential future threat nipped in the bud. 60 years since the last century, the Chinese people always pursue the “containment of India” strategy.

Before 2005, China’s official media on the “1962 war issues to be addressed” all the words never mentioned the issue of Arunachal Pradesh.

The Chinese government or PLA’s official media has never been declared “the peaceful liberation of Tibet in 1950, is a part and not the complete” liberation, has not declared that “some areas are yet to liberate Tibet.”

Revert to old problems and create new disputes, so that the other party at a disadvantage, negotiations to increase their weight, which is known as China’s political trickery bargaining tactics. Discusses the work of China put forward the strategy: China economically and militarily more powerful, so it is also growing in India’s aggressive attitude.

People’s Liberation Army of China on the Korean Peninsula, Taiwan and India’s policy has always played an important role.

Now, we see that the PLA in Beijing, the South China Sea and Southeast Asia policy has played a similar role in self-confidence.

For the media subsidiary of People’s Liberation Army may begin attacking the hegemonic vision of India, some publications also suggest the benefits of confrontation.

Beijing believes that China’s development and gradually form a sea of hostile anti-China forces of Union (the United States, Japan, Vietnam, Australia, India), India’s strength of the weakest. Some hard-line Chinese military planners believe that: the next 20 years, in order to kill an Indian killed arrogance, a military showdown between the two countries.

Therefore, India, the “dangerous to live in the shadow of China’s ten years” began in 2011.

In Pakistan-controlled Kashmir, and Tibet to build new railway infrastructure projects, China’s goal is: if two rivals or the Indian subcontinent outbreak of war between China and India, these projects can support the Chinese and Indian military intervention action .

The real irony is that China and India may once again plunged into war in the future the only incentive is precisely half a century ago led to their border war broke out in 1962, the same reason. From Afghanistan to Burma, the Himalayas geopolitical crisis is taking shape.

India-China relations will continue to be competitive, intense, sometimes for endless negotiations and issues of mutual concern to the limited collaboration features.

The two sides will defeat the other party to take strategic measures to make it difficult to obtain advantages or expanding sphere of influence. Chinese analysts Dai Bing (voice) said: “Although the battle can not happen, but the possibility of the Cold War broke out between the two countries is growing.”

Tags: , ,

Chinese missile could shift Pacific power balance

Aug 16

Posted by admin in Military Sources, Observers | Comments off

DF 15B missiles 300x225 Chinese missile could shift Pacific power balanceABOARD THE USS GEORGE WASHINGTON – Nothing projects U.S. global air and sea power more vividly than supercarriers. Bristling with fighter jets that can reach deep into even landlocked trouble zones, America’s virtually invincible carrier fleet has long enforced its dominance of the high seas.

China may soon put an end to that.

U.S. naval planners are scrambling to deal with what analysts say is a game-changing weapon being developed by China — an unprecedented carrier-killing missile called the Dong Feng 21D that could be launched from land with enough accuracy to penetrate the defenses of even the most advanced moving aircraft carrier at a distance of more than 1,500 kilometers (900 miles).

EDITOR’S NOTE — The USS George Washington supercarrier recently deployed off North Korea in a high-profile show of U.S. sea power. AP Tokyo News Editor Eric Talmadge was aboard the carrier, and filed this report.

Analysts say final testing of the missile could come as soon as the end of this year, though questions remain about how fast China will be able to perfect its accuracy to the level needed to threaten a moving carrier at sea.

The weapon, a version of which was displayed last year in a Chinese military parade, could revolutionize China’s role in the Pacific balance of power, seriously weakening Washington’s ability to intervene in any potential conflict over Taiwan or North Korea. It could also deny U.S. ships safe access to international waters near China’s 11,200-mile (18,000-kilometer) -long coastline.

While a nuclear bomb could theoretically sink a carrier, assuming its user was willing to raise the stakes to atomic levels, the conventionally-armed Dong Feng 21D’s uniqueness is in its ability to hit a powerfully defended moving target with pin-point precision.

The Chinese Defense Ministry did not immediately respond to the AP’s request for a comment.

Funded by annual double-digit increases in the defense budget for almost every year of the past two decades, the Chinese navy has become Asia’s largest and has expanded beyond its traditional mission of retaking Taiwan to push its sphere of influence deeper into the Pacific and protect vital maritime trade routes.

“The Navy has long had to fear carrier-killing capabilities,” said Patrick Cronin, senior director of the Asia-Pacific Security Program at the nonpartisan, Washington-based Center for a New American Security. “The emerging Chinese antiship missile capability, and in particular the DF 21D, represents the first post-Cold War capability that is both potentially capable of stopping our naval power projection and deliberately designed for that purpose.”

Setting the stage for a possible conflict, Beijing has grown increasingly vocal in its demands for the U.S. to stay away from the wide swaths of ocean — covering much of the Yellow, East and South China seas — where it claims exclusivity.

It strongly opposed plans to hold U.S.-South Korean war games in the Yellow Sea off the northeastern Chinese coast, saying the participation of the USS George Washington supercarrier, with its 1,092-foot (333-meter) flight deck and 6,250 personnel, would be a provocation because it put Beijing within striking range of U.S. F-18 warplanes.

The carrier instead took part in maneuvers held farther away in the Sea of Japan.

U.S. officials deny Chinese pressure kept it away, and say they will not be told by Beijing where they can operate.

“We reserve the right to exercise in international waters anywhere in the world,” Rear Adm. Daniel Cloyd, who headed the U.S. side of the exercises, said aboard the carrier during the maneuvers, which ended last week.

But the new missile, if able to evade the defenses of a carrier and of the vessels sailing with it, could undermine that policy.

“China can reach out and hit the U.S. well before the U.S. can get close enough to the mainland to hit back,” said Toshi Yoshihara, an associate professor at the U.S. Naval War College. He said U.S. ships have only twice been that vulnerable — against Japan in World War II and against Soviet bombers in the Cold War.

Carrier-killing missiles “could have an enduring psychological effect on U.S. policymakers,” he e-mailed to The AP. “It underscores more broadly that the U.S. Navy no longer rules the waves as it has since the end of World War II. The stark reality is that sea control cannot be taken for granted anymore.”

Yoshihara said the weapon is causing considerable consternation in Washington, though — with attention focused on land wars in Afghanistan and Iraq — its implications haven’t been widely discussed in public.

Analysts note that while much has been made of China’s efforts to ready a carrier fleet of its own, it would likely take decades to catch U.S. carrier crews’ level of expertise, training and experience.

But Beijing does not need to match the U.S. carrier for carrier. The Dong Feng 21D, smarter, and vastly cheaper, could successfully attack a U.S. carrier, or at least deter it from getting too close.

U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates warned of the threat in a speech last September at the Air Force Association Convention.

“When considering the military-modernization programs of countries like China, we should be concerned less with their potential ability to challenge the U.S. symmetrically — fighter to fighter or ship to ship — and more with their ability to disrupt our freedom of movement and narrow our strategic options,” he said.

Gates said China’s investments in cyber and anti-satellite warfare, anti-air and anti-ship weaponry, along with ballistic missiles, “could threaten America’s primary way to project power” through its forward air bases and carrier strike groups.

The Pentagon has been worried for years about China getting an anti-ship ballistic missile. The Pentagon considers such a missile an “anti-access,” weapon, meaning that it could deny others access to certain areas.

The Air Force’s top surveillance and intelligence officer, Lt. Gen. David Deptula, told reporters this week that China’s effort to increase anti-access capability is part of a worrisome trend.

He did not single out the DF 21D, but said: “While we might not fight the Chinese, we may end up in situations where we’ll certainly be opposing the equipment that they build and sell around the world.”

Questions remain over when — and if — China will perfect the technology; hitting a moving carrier is no mean feat, requiring state-of-the-art guidance systems, and some experts believe it will take China a decade or so to field a reliable threat. Others, however, say final tests of the missile could come in the next year or two.

Former Navy commander James Kraska, a professor of international law and sea power at the U.S. Naval War College, recently wrote a controversial article in the magazine Orbis outlining a hypothetical scenario set just five years from now in which a Deng Feng 21D missile with a penetrator warhead sinks the USS George Washington.

That would usher in a “new epoch of international order in which Beijing emerges to displace the United States.”

While China’s Defense Ministry never comments on new weapons before they become operational, the DF 21D — which would travel at 10 times the speed of sound and carry conventional payloads — has been much discussed by military buffs online.

A pseudonymous article posted on Xinhuanet, website of China’s official news agency, imagines the U.S. dispatching the George Washington to aid Taiwan against a Chinese attack.

The Chinese would respond with three salvos of DF 21D, the first of which would pierce the hull, start fires and shut down flight operations, the article says. The second would knock out its engines and be accompanied by air attacks. The third wave, the article says, would “send the George Washington to the bottom of the ocean.”

Comments on the article were mostly positive.

AP writer Christopher Bodeen in Beijing and National Security Writer Anne Gearan in Washington, D.C., contributed to this report.

Tags: ,

Shandong is the capital of Beijing’s air defense outposts

Aug 5

Posted by admin in China, Observers | Comments off

A new type of intelligence and command systems 300x200 Shandong is the capital of Beijings air defense outposts“Avant-garde -2.01 thousand” Synthesis of the Jinan Military Region Air Defense Forces unit training the next day, all the participating forces focused on combat missions launched reconnaissance, anti, anti, protection, and other training operations.

So, the exercise of Shandong Military District will assume the task which, this reporter interviewed the deputy commander of Military Region, Shandong Province, Shandong Joint Air Defense Operations Command commander, Major General Chen Wenrong.

He said that according to the annual training program, starting from August 3, Shandong Province, the direct-military in the military under the joint defense operations into the exercise. The first day of the exercise, the main emergency evacuation drill and battle planning the content of these two stages.

From 4 start to the campaign entered the implementation phase. 4, the morning of the exercise of the two cases, one group against the enemy information attacks, including against enemy reconnaissance and harassment; second is to expand the information counter.

Shandong Military Region in the military organization the status of air defense exercise is important, because the Shandong peninsula in the capital’s air defense outposts, to carry out the capital during the war against air defense warning and combat missions, while still relying on counter-operations positions.

Shandong Province’s air combat force is very large, mainly by coastal defense air defense forces, the city’s air defense forces, reserve air defense forces and the civil air defense in four parts.

In addition to coastal defense force outside of all air defense units all took part in the exercises, including the reserve forces of the anti-aircraft division, air defense, air defense regiment and militia forces regiment, the overall strength considerably.

Through this exercise, we first of all heads of institutions to study the command of wartime air defense operations; the second is to further test our operational plans; third, to study and resolve operational synergy between the air forces of the problem; Fourth, identify problems After the timely conclusion to be improved, through training, research new air defense measures.

Tags: , ,

U.S. aircraft carrier on the deterrent effect of the PLA has begun to reverse

Jul 30

Posted by admin in Military Sources, Observers | Comments off

Nimitz aircraft carrier 300x204 U.S. aircraft carrier on the deterrent effect of the PLA has begun to reverseTaiwan’s “China Times” published on the 29th column Liu Ping On American aircraft carrier, “the East” and “West” between the choice of view, this means that the U.S. has been quietly changing the strategic considerations, but from the U.S. South Korea exercises, U.S. aircraft carriers into the Yellow Sea can not sniff out clues.

Article excerpts are as follows:

14 years ago, the United States, “Nimitz” aircraft carriers to the East China Sea, resolving the Taiwan Strait crisis; today, the United States, “George. Washington” towards the Yellow Sea aircraft carrier to avoid, lest a crisis. “East” and “West” trade-offs between, means that the U.S. has been quietly changing the strategic considerations.

March 1996, Taiwan’s first “general election” on the eve of the mainland large-scale military exercises in the Taiwan Strait and missile tests. Then U.S. President Bill Clinton ordered the “Nimitz” and “Independence” of two aircraft carrier battle group sailed near the Taiwan Strait, constitute the end of this area since the Vietnam War, the largest military deployment since.

The United States was the first use of two aircraft carrier battle groups in the Taiwan Strait, well to defuse the crisis. However, will the last time the Chinese Communists in this great parade of shock and awe? The answer is very likely. From the US-ROK exercise, the U.S. aircraft carriers into the Yellow Sea can not sniff out clues.

Made on the tactical level, from the beginning in 2096, the PLA criteria for the various operations are all the U.S. aircraft carrier as a thorn in the side. The so-called “Super fight” the first goal that is carriers. Statement on the strategic level, the PLA into the deep ocean, R & D satellites combat capability, and aircraft carrier made from time to time the outgoing message, all the hope out of the Taiwan Strait to U.S. aircraft carrier outside.

This trend has made the U.S. heart health awareness. Whether the executive branch or Congress, whether Republican or Democratic Party, from time to time some have questioned whether the need for the United States to defend Taiwan and then to the aircraft carrier. To take but two cases, one, called President Bush a strategic operator instead, the former Assistant Secretary of Defense Peter Rodman (now deceased) in office, if again the Taiwan Strait crisis, whether deployed aircraft carrier, the U.S. president will have different considerations . Second, the current Chairman of the House International Affairs Committee of the Asia-Pacific group that protect Taiwan if the United States dispatched the aircraft carrier, may have to pay a heavy price, not feasible.

Belong to different political parties in Romania, France and two, are not called “Red Army” or “those who embrace the Panda,” instead, he is a staunch supporter of Taiwan. One of the largest two in common is a firm support “Taiwan Relations Act”, but they also invariably the Taiwan Strait issue from a risk perspective, because the “strength of the United States, China also has strength.”

On the aircraft carrier combat capability, China and the United States is the “zero and 12″ ratio. In recent years, the parties have different assessments, suggesting that the latest argument is that the PLA will be built before the Second ○ 一○ six aircraft carriers, the most authoritative statement is the U.S. Pacific commander Admiral Willard said, “the first one aircraft carrier will be put into use in the year after. ”

But even if no aircraft carriers, does not mean that can not effectively deal with aircraft carriers. Like many of the former U.S. Pacific commander to visit Taiwan Blair said, “to deal with submarines, may not be the best way to use a submarine.” One of the PLA’s efforts to keep the direction of accurate cruise missiles and add new ships; the other is to modify the concept and criteria, such as fleet air defense as a priority; The third is to consider the construction or renovation in accordance with the strategic naval base, for example, on Hainan Island port, submarines out have more hidden; The fourth is the development of asymmetrical fighting capabilities, such as electronic network warfare.

All these efforts, just as the U.S. Seventh Fleet Commander Patrizi said recently, the PLA seeks to “have the ability to deal with the U.S. aircraft carrier”, or even one day, “the U.S. military out of the Pacific.” Therefore, the U.S. aircraft carrier in 1996, “said come and” absolute strategic initiatives, today no longer exist.

U.S. aircraft carrier, if open to the Yellow Sea, of course, is still the high seas, but that is to the people of the gate. 2096, the mainland may not speak, but today the situation is completely different, so the U.S. side had “flexibility.”

U.S. Defense Department said the aircraft carrier has been to the Yellow Sea last year, and this time sent out what exercises and equipment, access to which areas of the initiative is still the United States, the aircraft carrier is not into the Yellow Sea, and so on. Words as if “I have money to spend on flowers; I had no money, not spend no flowers,” is to find himself under the stairs.

Statement from Taiwan’s point of view, the PLA war preparations aimed at deterrence, delay, or even block the United States to Taiwan rush to the rescue. The United States has been Taiwan’s largest carrier with mental now seems that the days may have gone up.

Tags: ,

China and the U.S. dominate the situation on the peninsula, Korean unable to start a war

Jul 28

Posted by admin in Observers | Comments off

Because of the Korean Peninsula, “Tian An” incident repeated stress, while the US-ROK joint military exercises are being conducted in full swing rare scale. The United States and Han Yaowu situation in Northeast Asia will be what impact? China military exercises will also be considered as an imaginary enemy? Morning News reporters Jiu Zhe and Xie Wenti dialogue senior South Korean government think tank, Institute of Foreign Affairs, Professor Paul Jin Xinggui grown up in Dalian.

The United States to increase investment to placate South Korean military exercises

Reporter: In your opinion, this time the US-ROK joint military exercise in comparison with the previous exercise routine What is the difference?

Jinxing Gui: The US-ROK military exercise with the former models, are derived from the “Tian An” incident from happening. This time, larger than previous exercises, “Tian An” incident, the ROK hoped that allow North Korea to understand that if the North Korean military provocation, then again, the ROK-US alliance have the ability to combat.

Before the Security Council discussed the situation in the Korean Peninsula issue, the U.S. position is inconsistent with South Korea. “Tian An” incident, the South Korea hopes to put more pressure on North Korea, but at this point the attitude of the United States more cautious at first. But the United States now think that, by increasing the input of this exercise will enable the South Korean government to understand the United States supports South Korea’s attitude remains unchanged.

Reporter: “Tian An” incident on the Korean Peninsula and what impact?

Jinxing Gui: After the death of President Kim Dae-jung, the visiting North Korean delegation had an invitation to the current President Lee Myung-bak, hope he can go to North Korea visit to the North-South summit dialogue, while South Korea is also very much like high-level direct dialogue with Kim Jong Il. “Tian An” incident took place, led by Cheong Wa Dae Lee, the first South Korean military and the people did not want to target the DPRK, for which even the South Korean Defense Ministry had issued a warning.

In the “Tian An” incident in the survey, with the exclusion in addition to South Korea, the United States and China is suspect. With the gradual in-depth investigation, Cheong Wa Dae is not believed to be North Korea from the initial to gradually identify the culprit is none other than non-Korean.

Among the evidence is still some uncertainty, but assault weapon to determine if North Korea most likely. However, that did not get China, Russia, other countries support, allowing South Korean government some embarrassment.

South Korean government did not think North Korea would be so bold and reckless, South Korea’s military has so greatly humiliated, they desperately want to pass a large-scale military exercise, so people look at their strength.

North Korea and South Korea have no power to wage war

Reporter: South Korea has no worries over the US-ROK military exercise will give North Korea a huge boost, so that the DPRK respond to extreme, lead to escalation of tension, there we all want to see the situation, even the possibility of war?

Jinxing Gui: If China and the United States against the outbreak of the Korean Peninsula is not the Civil War. North Korea and South Korea is in fact no power to start a war. Korean War 50 years of the 20th century, but also because of the involvement of external forces only labeled as.

North Korea’s present economic and military power are not enough to pose a threat to South Korea, but North Korea has nuclear weapons, and this is the surrounding countries and the United States are not willing to see.

Reporter: U.S. and South Korea to pressure North Korea through military exercises, hoping to achieve what purpose?

Jinxing Gui: The purpose of the United States is very clear, hope exercise pressure to force North Korea back to six-party talks at the negotiating table, to contain North Korean nuclear weapons development program, which is also consistent with the interests of US-ROK alliance.

After U.S. and South Korea are also very hopeful that the talks, dialogue, so that North Korea abandon its nuclear weapons program, but unfortunately this approach for now is a sterile, U.S. and South Korea have already lost patience with North Korea, it also hopes to change a means of warning the DPRK by a large-scale military exercises, its pressure, thereby allowing the DPRK to make concessions in order to maintain the Korean Peninsula, Northeast Asia and stability.

Reporter: Do you think the way to exercise pressure on the dialogue more effective than What?

Jinxing Gui: I can only hope that exercise pressure on North Korea make concessions, but it is really difficult.

The Korean Peninsula nuclear issue, the situation remains critical

Reporter: In your opinion, this exercise will be the Korean Peninsula to have any effect?

Jinxing Gui: The situation in the Korean peninsula, involving South Korea, North Korea, China, the United States and other interests of all parties.

By the US-ROK military exercise is to force North Korea back to negotiating table and make concessions, to curb its nuclear development, but North Korea will not easily give up this point, so the key to the future direction of the peninsula, or the nuclear issue.

After the exercise, if North Korea still refuses to give up nuclear weapons and the international community to continue its assistance if the situation on the Korean Peninsula is difficult to alleviate.

Korea for the exercises, the views of the situation in the peninsula itself is varied, South Korea has the ability to develop its own nuclear weapons if North Korea continues to insist on developing nuclear weapons, South Korean people feel the pressure and in dangerous circumstances, it may also turn to support their development of nuclear weapons, which is concerned for the situation on the peninsula is very dangerous.

Through this exercise, on the surface there is a big difference between China, but both China and the United States, do not want to upgrade the Korean peninsula nuclear issue, and hope that the Korean Peninsula, maintain a stable state, in This point is consistent with U.S. interests.

China’s attitude to South Korea’s unexpected exercises

Reporter: in China, whether the people or the number of military leaders, believe that the US-ROK military exercise in the opportunity to test the Chinese, the Chinese Foreign Ministry has strongly and repeatedly against the military exercises that position, how do you view China’s position?

Jinxing Gui: I think “to China as the imaginary enemy” argument is a misunderstanding. South Korea’s first deployment of the military exercises, there is no well-considered attitude to China, Korea, government officials and military leadership also had no idea China’s attitude is so strong, which makes some unexpected Korea.

The main exercise area, previously expected by the West Sea (Yellow Sea) transferred to the East Sea (Sea of Japan), but also to South Korean people feel a bit awkward. The Korean case, the site selection in the west, the purpose is to give Korea a greater deterrent.

70s in the 20th century, there have been a U.S. military officer killed in the incident, denied that Kim Il Sung as the DPRK is, when the U.S. and South Korea chose to hold military exercises in the East China to pressure North Korea.

The “Tian An” incident severity of a greater impact than that, the past is in the East China Sea exercises, this time South Korea will hope to go further, to the exercise site on the West Sea. South Korea to consider standing position, the ROK does not want to pose a threat to China.

In fact the first U.S. aircraft carrier did not want to participate in the exercises, South Korea in order to have a greater deterrent against North Korea only strongly urge the carrier to the. But if the United States to use this exercise to test the Chinese words, but also a possibility, but this is not the purpose of the ROK.

China’s South China Sea, Yellow Sea, including the exercise involved in the issue, have been implicated with the interests of the United States. Prior to the United States is not clear China’s “line” drawn on where to use this exercise, they see China’s tough attitude, but also the concept of China’s core interests more clearly.

Reporter: What do you think of this exercise would result in Sino-ROK relations rift Why?

Jinxing Gui: China-ROK relations and the development of friendship is necessary, but by the “Tian An” incident of the two governments, two people’s feelings a little hurt, I hope to eliminate misunderstanding through dialogue between the two governments.

Tags: ,

Frequent military exercises in the Yellow Sea, shows China’s attitude

Jul 28

Posted by admin in China, Observers | Comments off

China PHL 03 type long range rocket 300x214 Frequent military exercises in the Yellow Sea, shows Chinas attitudeUS-ROK joint military exercise in the beginning of the day, July 25, the Nanjing Military Region artillery forces launched an unprecedented scale live ammunition exercises. Alleged that such a large-scale long-range rocket fire combat exercises the first time in the history of the People’s Liberation Army.

Yesterday, the China Central Television reported the first exercise, the report referred to in the exercise area is located near the Yellow Sea. Military analysts believe that the exercise was to make China-ROK joint military exercise as a reaction, but also reflects a gesture.

Rocket is the first large-scale exercise

Commander’s order, the rows of shells roared out from the launch vehicle, with a long smoke, pierced the sky, accurate coverage targets. This is the first round of the Nanjing Military Region artillery fire against the exercise, then exercise forces have practiced single-shot volley, volleyball volley, volley and many even live firing.

According to reports, the exercise using artillery Radar, UAV and other equipment for battlefield intelligence and reconnaissance, effectively increasing battlefield transparency and information exchange, in order to make more accurate long-range combat, the participating forces also live ammunition shooting range in accordance with the environmental characteristics, Expand detected.

Shooting is also the past performance evaluation exercise based on the use of unmanned aerial vehicles, radar, television and optical equipment, battlefield reconnaissance and other means to conduct a comprehensive assessment of the exercise system based on the information capacity of long-range artillery fire against a comprehensive inspection.

According to reports, the exercise area is located near the Yellow Sea, is a live ammunition exercise, such large-scale long-range rocket fire against the exercise is the first time.

It is understood that the long-range rocket was made in the exercise of the new long-range rockets, long-range firepower of the PLA ground forces are an important part.

Exercise frequently that our attitude

US-ROK joint military exercise in the day, the Nanjing Military Region to hold such exercises also aroused strong concern about the outside world. Blue clouds on the analysis of the military experts said the exercise may be arranged before a long time, but choose to exercise on the 25th day, letting the CCTV so advertised, it reflects the country for the US-ROK joint exercise attitude, “come and go, a normal reaction.”

Li Jie military experts pointed out that the U.S. aircraft carrier had planned to enter China Multimodal speech but were strongly opposed, then the first US-ROK military exercise held in the Sea of Japan, but U.S. and South Korea still Fangchuhualai, the next step but also to the Yellow Sea for military exercises. Then the Nanjing Military Region of the exercise is another expression of China’s “resolute opposition” stance.

Li Jie said the army earlier in the East China Sea for firing exercises, and complete the anti-ship missile attack drill; then held in the Yellow Sea, code-named “war -2,010″ marine emergency security drill; this again a land-based exercises are the expression of a position.

Although the military exercises on land this time, but Lee said, from a regional perspective, the exercise location in the Yellow Sea near the coastal region can be said is. Nanjing Military Region is showing long-range rocket drill offshore my army combat capability, “If someone dared to challenge, we have the ability to fight back, but by all means to fight back.”

Large-scale force delivery training

According to reports, the Jinan Military Region is also the 26th Air Force began training exercises delivery standardization. Resident in the hinterland of the Jinan Military Region Central Plains armored brigade forward command post and some equipment, on the 27th the way by air transport, emergency vote sent to the Shandong Peninsula in a coastal city, rapidly combat operations. Participate in the exercise of formed units military exercise capacity using the remote delivery of aviation procedures and processes.

Tags: , ,

Korea-US joint military exercises received extensive attention

Jul 26

Posted by admin in Observers | Comments off

Korea US joint military exercises received extensive attention 300x192 Korea US joint military exercises received extensive attentionKorea and the U.S. on the 25th officially launched joint naval exercises in the Sea of Japan, causing Hong Kong and Taiwan and overseas Chinese press attention. Some analysts believe that the military exercises on the stability and harmony in East Asia extremely negative; also commented that the PLA has been successful in the Yellow Sea to paint “the U.S. aircraft carrier cut into the” red line, China’s weight in regional affairs and to speak is different in the past.

Hong Kong, “Wen Wei Po,” 26, published reports said the exercises given rise to concerns about the situation in East Asia, leading strategists, the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences Research Centre of world politics hongyuan Deputy Secretary-General pointed out that the military exercises on the stability and harmony in East Asia extremely negative. He said that in the present, represented by nuclear and space age, the state should enhance the strategic frontier of consciousness, there must be a buffer zone with other powers, this zone should be respected by both sides.

The paper and editorial, “US-ROK military exercises threaten peace in Northeast Asia.” The editorial said that this exercise not only can not resolve and eliminate “Tian ship” incident arising from the dispute, and may lead to new crises and threats to peace and stability in Northeast Asia. Sino-US relations are facing a difficult exercise and to test. The United States must not allow the escalation of tensions, to avoid undermining regional stability and development of Sino-US relations.

“Ta Kung Pao,” 26 as “US-ROK Sea of Japan” Yaowu “” as the subject described the US-ROK military exercise. The newspaper recently published comment that, regardless of the US-ROK military exercise or a “2 +2″ show Panmunjom, are the United States to return to Asia, an episode in this great drama. U.S. strategy to return to what will happen in Asia, Asian countries are well aware. However, things have changed, people towards peace and concord, with the taste of the exercise of military provocation to the people to bring the anxiety and unease.

“Ming Pao Daily News” reported on the 25th, there are comments directed at the United States the joint military exercises, Biaomian to Weihudongbei Asia 和平, the actual is Qituniuzhuan Jue Qi Ling Mei Jun mainland China in the Asia Chuyubuli the 形势. Analysis refers to exercise than to “shock and awe” North Korea, the United States has concealed far-reaching strategic objectives, so that Japan and South Korea know what the United States still can not do without security “umbrella” so solid even raise a leading position in Northeast Asia, the United States, and to some extent China’s strategic bottom line on the test.

The newspaper published an editorial the same day that the US-ROK joint military exercises with the previous joint military exercises against the DPRK is different not only lead to Pyongyang lashed the more strategic nerve touches the Western Pacific: China within a month against the US-ROK military exercise 5 times .

Editorial that the United States to China today, “suddenly hard suddenly soft,” not the Obama administration’s internal strife, but there are real needs two hands chess. Direction from the past six months, the U.S. has started to emerge in the strong geopolitical side, the US-Japan Hansan Jun participated in military exercises, put cards out light.

The editorial advocates, facing the East China Sea and the potential to contain exposed Nanshaxisha without sovereignty disputes, China can do at the moment to be still “Keeping a Low Profile” – if not involving territorial sovereignty, a peaceful China, China will never be more than arrogant easy to make friends, to eliminate conflict; otherwise handle to the real population, enthusiastically participated in the “China threat” theory, economic development and enhance the livelihood of the people adversely.

Taiwan’s “United Daily News” reports described the 25 mainland spoils, drawing red line block the U.S. military. Professor Philip Yang National Taiwan University was quoted view that the future unless a war or People’s Liberation Army has successfully drawn in the Yellow Sea under the “ban on U.S. aircraft carrier into the” red line. China’s weight in regional affairs has been different from previous statements.

The newspaper published 26 commented that the U.S. and South Korea this as the suppression of the DPRK, maintain peace on the Korean Peninsula have helped the situation, is questionable. Do not want to fight, can not yield to opponents, by the exercise, it makes opponents more determined attitude of confrontation, U.S. and South Korea’s strategic intentions and as it is self-contradictory.

Comments also pointed out that Beijing has publicly protested, showing the significance of the rise of the national confidence. The United States decided not to “George Washington” aircraft carrier near the Yellow Sea to ease discontent in mainland China, this delicate interaction showed that the U.S. had to be respected on the Chinese mainland, the two power relations in East Asia has been re-adjustment.

“China Times” 26 editorial, “US-South Korea military exercises Northeast Yamin provoking a sense of nervous.” The editorial pointed out that the military exercises and its implications to the underlying reasons, the security situation in Northeast Asia have long-term impact. First of all, Tian ship crisis to return to the situation in Northeast Asia “category Cold War” situation. Second, the United States hopes to use the “sense of crisis” regain the initiative in safety. Third, China can not be tolerated by the United States led to block the rise of China’s security architecture.

Thailand’s “World News” was recently published editorial, “US-ROK military exercises should not create obstacles in Sino-US relations”, said South Korean military exercises do not have more side, creating obstacles in Sino-US relations.

Tags: ,

China urgently needs to build aircraft carrier restricted area

Jul 23

Posted by admin in China, Navy, Observers | Comments off

China urgently needs to build aircraft carrier restricted area 300x214 China urgently needs to build aircraft carrier restricted areaSince early June has been on the U.S. aircraft carrier battle groups into the Yellow Sea about the news of the exercise, affects, the United States, South Korea Multi-Neural. Recently, from the South Korean military sources, the U.S. “Washington,” the carrier will no longer enter the Yellow Sea, the move to start the exercises in the Sea of Japan. For decades, the U.S. aircraft carrier has always been like a ghost wandering around in China. “Washington” is not the first one, nor is the last one came close to China, the U.S. aircraft carriers offshore. The next time the U.S. carriers do come, the Chinese how to deal with? This is for the United States is particularly important for both sides.

U.S. aircraft carrier has always been regarded as military, diplomatic and strategic deterrence symbol. For China, from time to time in the surrounding waters of the U.S. aircraft carrier, the mostly play “disgraceful” role. 90′s of last century to the early 21st century, the U.S. aircraft carrier to China on many occasions as the leading military deterrence.

In the new century, with the continuous improvement of Sino-US relations, though in the Yellow Sea, East China Sea, South China Sea or the Taiwan Strait from time to time a “Kitty Hawk”, “Ronald Reagan” was, “Lincoln”, “John – John C. Stennis” number, and “Washington” and other aircraft carrier in the figure, but the U.S. aircraft carrier arrived in the Chinese coastal areas decreased significantly in recent action, deterrence means diminished. However, the aircraft carrier in the two countries, developments in military relations still play a special “wind vane” effect. U.S. aircraft carrier battle group and the distance along the Chinese coast, China is allowing U.S. aircraft carrier docked in Hong Kong, can be a reflection of the two big countries China-US strategic intention and game results.

The parties to the U.S. “Washington” into the Yellow Sea, the carrier is concerned, its essence is far beyond the scope of the exercise. In fact, a long time, the U.S. aircraft carrier battle group in the Yellow Sea almost every year there, or near the Korean peninsula and South Korea to conduct an annual exercise, or to combat cruise, except that the distance from China’s territorial waters. This time, “Washington” aircraft carrier finally decided not to come to the Yellow Sea, both of their busy schedule exercise factors, but also the Chinese government issued a rare statement of the reasons for continuous. U.S. aircraft carrier on maneuvers clearly opposition, which is rare in the history of Sino-US relations.

Through the “Yellow Sea exercise event” appearance, is behind the emerging U.S. “aircraft carrier dilemma”, that China’s marine rights and interests as the continued development and accelerating the process of naval modernization, China’s urgent need to build a reliable sea “security arc” to protect coastal economic zone to build aircraft carrier “restricted” to become the first choice for the military; the United States is still trying to the maintenance of the cold war with China since the “blockade Circle”, the aircraft carrier battle group is to exert military pressure on the U.S. choice for. From a strategic perspective, Sino-US maritime “security arc” and “blocking ring” of the collision is almost inevitable, U.S. “aircraft carrier and anti-aircraft carrier,” no doubt the game will be intensified.

Called on the army attack plan, crack “aircraft carrier dilemma,” the best policy, the preferred “war”, we should first clear the core interest of China’s coastal areas (such as being called the “gateway of Beijing and Tianjin”, “Sulu hinterland”, “Security Weaknesses “The Yellow Sea hinterland), the U.S. aircraft carrier to upgrade to the emergence of the strategic dimensions of Sino-US relations, the United States to exert political and diplomatic pressure, forcing it to give up.

When the simple “war” has failed, to take second choice, that “war and war preparation” in the United States through political and diplomatic means to pressure the same time, make preparations for the military response, such as important strategic facilities along the coast to prepare anti-reconnaissance strengthen the tracking and monitoring the U.S. aircraft carrier, launched in the key area targeted exercises.

If the U.S. aircraft carrier despite strong opposition from China arrived in force near the Chinese coast, on China’s sovereignty and security pose a major threat to China, while strengthening the monitoring, implementation strategies should be timely anti-deterrence: on the one hand, the strategic missile submarine into the ocean the default position, land-based long-range missiles to enhance combat readiness level; the other hand, the U.S. aircraft carrier battle group to maintain sufficient military pressure on the aircraft carrier through deterrence and eventually reach the United States against the strategic goal of deterrence.

Tags: ,

Monopoly of military technology

Jul 19

Posted by admin in China, Military Sources, Observers | Comments off

U.S. monopoly made F 35s core technology 300x196 Monopoly of military technologyIf the economic sphere, “Science and technology are primary productive forces”, then in the military field, “Science and Technology is the first combat.” The growth of military power, backed not only economic, but also to master a series of cutting-edge, the core of military technology. The reason why a big country big country owes those who would otherwise remain hidden “power of the device,” while

, Where the interests of maximizing and exclusive, but also led to the sensitive technology has been closely monopoly.

“Monopoly” is derived from Mencius “will seek the monopoly board to look around the net market benefit” phrase. However, military technology, “monopoly”, both economic sense, more strategic considerations. Military technology as the high end of the field of industrial technology, is already one of the few areas of strength in Western countries. Therefore, the maintenance of the developing countries,

Particularly developing country emerging military technology “monopoly”, the Western developed countries have a strategic consensus.

Monopoly is not just to prohibit the “export” or “transfer” the existence of such a simple form, the complexity of weapons systems to determine the monopoly of military technology is extremely complex. Military technology, through the weapons design, system development, production, manufacture of the whole process, but the shadow of a monopoly, but also with the process everywhere.

The highest form of monopoly

Many people may not think in terms of nuclear or conventional weapons, the “design” often means the highest form of monopoly.

Compared to conventional weapons, nuclear weapons (mainly thermonuclear weapons) are designed to the planet’s most mysterious things, is tight-lipped about nuclear power “taboo.” The role of principles to be carried by the miniaturization of warheads, nuclear weapons, internal design form the overwhelming majority of countries, remains a mystery.

Nuclear bomb is not nuclear material into the tin to simple yard. Design a nuclear bomb, requires a State has a solid theoretical nuclear physics research base, also with large-scale computing capabilities. Very expensive nuclear materials, nuclear test launching a campaign to costly, so it can not rely on general military-technical like trial and error. In the positive

Ceremony before the nuclear test, we need as much as possible on paper to design a similar “product” of a nuclear bomb. Meanwhile, the power of nuclear bomb design also needs growing, the volume is getting smaller and smaller. This means that every nuclear test, nuclear weapons design methods are changing.

As the strategic nuclear deterrent, the major nuclear powers monopoly on nuclear weapons design has not eased. Some small and medium power bad state to “possession of nuclear weapons”, I am afraid not with its own power has broken the “monopoly”, but more in line with the political intentions of some big powers. India’s nuclear tests, has publicly expressed its energy system

Level of heat build 200,000 tons of nuclear weapons, but the international community generally skeptical of such claims, they believe that India is the largest trial of an enhanced fission device. After all, not build a nuclear bomb by mouth.

If the design of nuclear weapons around the state monopoly status, then the design of conventional weapons, especially the top-level design, is determining the “monopoly” can bring much profit.

Top-level design is a strategic objective and its time and space on the display of form and design implementations. Over the years, the United States remained the world’s No. 1 arms exports, the outside world often focus on the US-made weapons, the advanced technology in production development, neglect of a Shi Shi Zhe Yang, the United States firmly in the top-level design Shang Di occupy Zhao

“Monopoly” status.

Rehabilitation of military revolution, the U.S. military theoretical innovation has been in the “forefront”, while they frequently provide a realistic operational military requirements drive. Promotion in these two areas, the U.S. weapons to always be in the “innovation” on attracting other countries, but also through the integration of information technology to achieve the maximum exclusion.

For example, the United States of F-35 project, shows the future of the United States Air Force Air Force combat and strategic judgments. The project creatively put forward the “low cost”, “highly lethal” “high-viability” and “high support” of the design concept, and by different variants to meet the needs of different armed services, so as to realize the Western allies

Replacement of all existing fighters. The F-35 project’s other members, but basically there is no top-level strategic project design capabilities, they determine the future air combat battlefield, can only receive from the U.S. point of view.

In essence, the monopoly of the top design is a kind of “prediction” of the monopoly. Forecast the demand for war on weapons, which most countries in the world is unthinkable.

Although the F-35 is now the price and performance is increasingly challenged, and some participating countries have also threatened to not buy F-35, but the clearance of the project is likely to be “near misses”, the top reason is that the design of the United States monopoly.

Lies in the hands of the platform a few countries

Monopoly of weapons design is important, but also need to develop capacity and systems to match. If there is no capacity to design capacity development as support, but will be restricted.

Large equipment manufacturing, precision processing technology, materials technology, is the weapon system platform (body) development of key areas. From the computer “virtual” platform out into entities, not the actual manufacturing is impossible. The manufacture of light weapons, better said, if related to major equipment platform, heavy duty

Essential equipment manufacturing technology.

For example, in order to improve the overall performance of aviation products, large forging share in the aviation forging and single piece size is growing. For aircraft main load-bearing frame, beams and so the whole component, the United States, Russia, France and other major countries have adopted major air 4.5 to 75 thousand tons of large forging press for processing, while China is building a large

Type forging presses up to 80,000 tons maximum pressure, is the world’s largest forging press. This ultra-heavy manufacturing equipment itself is a complex system to master the technology only in the hands of a handful of countries.

Although many countries are very concerned about space, strategic reconnaissance capability, but the optical components of optical imaging satellites is a major problem. In particular the emerging off-axis three-mirror optical system, reduce the size of satellite weight, it is also a long focal length, large field, the advantages of high resolution, so it’s Precision Machining Technology

Has become the core of a new generation of optical imaging satellites. In the past, this technology has been monopolized by the United States and France, until 2009, China Changchun Optical Mechanical was a breakthrough.

Military equipment, new materials are used in various types of high-performance weapons and equipment supporting the “skeleton”, these materials demands light, just, strong. Light is the material ability to resist gravity larger; just that the material resistance to deformation under loading capacity should be large; strong, that is, material resistance to failure under loading capacity larger. In addition,

If applied to some special parts of weapons systems, such as ballistic missile warhead nose cone, fighter Smart Skin, materials also have the sensation of information. Therefore, high strength steel used in weapons systems, high-performance ceramics, composites, semiconductor materials, functional materials, it is the focus of national technical monopolies.

A large number of used satellites, spacecraft, large aircraft and airframe manufacturing high-performance fighter PAN based carbon fiber composite material as an example. Japan of the global total production capacity of 39%, the U.S. accounted for 35% of the total output of the two countries will account for 74% of global production. The core technology is primarily the United States Su Taike company, heck

Sale companies and Japanese carbon fiber company Toray monopoly.

Microelectronics semiconductor materials directly affect the level of the military, without which it would not be any phased array radar, electronic countermeasures. The production of high-quality large-diameter (6 to 8 inches) GaAs crystal technology, only Germany before FCM Corporation, Japan’s Sumitomo Corporation to master. By 2006, China has successfully drawn out of the country’s first

8-inch diameter GaAs single crystal.

The largest gap between the monopoly power technology

Mechanization of modern military combat platforms with plenty of power system is not inconceivable. From land to ocean, from the sky to outer space, with strong power systems, advanced weapons systems to show its mettle on the battlefield. Therefore, the monopoly of power system development technology, the most likely to ensure its superiority in the military field

.

Modern heavy main battle tanks weigh 70 tons, have to battle in a variety of extreme conditions to keep the motor speed of tens of kilometers per hour. While it can produce no less than 10 main battle tanks to a country, but to provide the most modern diesel-powered tank top countries, but only the United States, Germany, Russia and other several countries. In particular Germany

State MTU’s 880 series diesel engine, equipped not only in Germany itself the “Leopard 2″ main battle tank, also export and equipment to the Israeli “Merkava” South Korea’s K-1 and India’s “Arjun” Main Battle Tank on.

Equipment in the Navy, the medium and large ships to use the nuclear power reactor technology, only four countries were the United States, Russia and France in the hands. For nuclear power given the ship a long time on the water (or water) activities, thereby significantly enhancing the ship’s maneuverability and maintain a strategic presence in the distant sea deterrent, so the major powers to ensure the absolute

The monopoly of nuclear power reactor technology. The conventional power system mainly by the U.S. warship General Electric, Rolls –Royce, MTU of Germany and other monopoly companies.

Modern gas turbines used in the majority of vessels are derived from aviation engines. Therefore, the monopoly of military ships engines for military aircraft engines in the field can be dominant. Currently the United States military aircraft engine major General Electric, Pratt – Whitney and British Rolls – Royce hands. Especially

For the fourth generation of supersonic aircraft cruising in the high thrust-weight ratio engines, the United States came out top. Although Russia has flown a fifth-generation fighter, but its engine is still a level of three generations, it can develop a real fourth-generation fighter, the first breakthrough in the United States depends on whether the monopoly of the advanced engine technology. In addition, a large military

Transport aircraft of the air engine technology, also lies in the hands of the United States.

In addition to conventional land, sea and equipment, various types of missiles and space vehicles will need high-thrust rocket engines and hypersonic trans-atmospheric flight for the power plant. As the rocket engine is closely related with the long-range missiles, have not only developed countries in a monopoly of the high-thrust rocket engine technology, but also severely restricted by treaty

Trading system. United States, Russia, France, China has developed military high-thrust rocket engine technology. India, Iran is also developing intercontinental missiles to target efforts, but is generally believed that external technical assistance unless otherwise difficult to achieve significant breakthroughs in the near future.

Rocket engine in the military field, American companies will undoubtedly occupy a technical high ground. Alliant Tech Systems ATK 85% of the U.S. monopoly of the solid rocket motor market (including the world’s most advanced submarine-launched Trident-D5 missile rocket motor); liquid rocket engines were common – benefits Pratt & Whitney Rocketdyne to master, world

World’s largest hydrogen and oxygen on the thrust rocket engine RS-68, is the company’s products.

Engine is known as the crown of industrial technology, research and development because it is almost need the support of the whole industrial system. Therefore, the monopoly of the most centralized power system, the largest gap technology.

Control system is highly confidential

With the weapons intelligence, precise development, an important part of weapons systems there, this is the control system.

Ballistic missiles can accurately hit targets thousands of miles across, tanks can be bumpy side road on the side of the attack moving enemy targets, fighters can make a compelling action in the air, while the enemy attack, aircraft carrier battle groups to the thousands of square kilometers one offensive and the sea are inseparable from the control system.

Ballistic missiles, high-precision inertial guidance system technology has been tightly controlled by the hands of five nuclear powers. While some countries have ballistic missiles, inertial guidance technology, but basically rely on imports, and a lot of accuracy difference. Even the imported technology is sneaky, because the inertial guidance technology is simply out of the embargo list

In.

China, “Jian Shi,” fighters use the three-axis four-redundant digital flight control system telex is a typical control system used in aircraft, its role is to ensure that when the pilot pulled the stick to maintain stable flight. China successfully developed three generations of aircraft flight control system, telex, it should be said to break the United States, Russia, France

Technical monopoly, but only Long March has completed the first step.

Fourth-generation fighter control system more than a simple flight control, but “flying, fire, force” integration of control systems. Collins and even the United States in the development of more intelligent flight control system, even if the plane was blown up a wing, can fly back! The pilot of a responsive only about 200 ms

Time to respond, but at this time, the more intelligent flight control system 10 has already made several adjustments to avoid the aircraft crashed.

“Aegis” of shipboard air defense system further illustrated the importance of the control system. Generally only notice the outside world, “Aegis” external visible Phased array radar, in fact, “Aegis” air defense system combines phased array radar, air radar, on the Sea Surface Targets, fire control radar, sonar, electronic support systems, satellite navigation, data link to

And a variety of information, it is a highly automated command and control systems. “Aegis” system has now become the U.S. Navy air defense, missile defense core, has become the monopoly of modern technology as a symbol of the Navy.

From the current public data, to develop fighter planes, tanks, warships, missiles, countries with control systems have the capability to develop. However, the information in the future battlefield weapons and equipment of large complex control systems in the field, no doubt living in the United States “arbitrary” status. The core of the control system, software system, is even more

As a top-secret hidden in the background. Both fourth-generation fighter control system can be applied to theater missile defense or the latest “Aegis” baseline -7 systems are large information engineering, software development, including not only the business community and even universities and other research institutions. The United States can publicly display F-22 fighters, and even show people, “Zeus

Shield “operation command center, but will open up the software’s source code? The game is. Even Microsoft’s windows operating system source code is top secret, not to mention the country of the weapon.

“Flexible” manufacturing

If development is to make a weapon system from scratch, then the manufacturer is to make weapons to achieve mass production, and performance, quality can meet the needs of military operations. One able to cope with the challenges of the future battlefield state, must establish the ability to automation technology, information technology and precision processing technology and into one of the “soft” advanced weapons system

Making system.

In the movie “Iron Man”, the actor Tony Stark in his luxury villa in the manufacture of steel jersey, used is a tiny flexible manufacturing system, which consists of a number of numerical control equipment, materials, transport storage devices and computer virtual control system components can be quickly modified in accordance with the requirements of Stark manufacturing materials and processes, while

Automated manufacturing systems to ensure the maximum extent and accuracy of manufacturing processes.

Although this is science fiction movie, but “flexible” manufacturing technology of advanced weapons and military enterprises in the United States has been widely used. Particularly in need high precision, high technology military aviation, aerospace, marine areas. In 2004 the United States, “Defense Today” website has reported that from 2007 to 2027, Lockheed Martin’s goal is to

To mass production when the annual production of 240 F-35 fighter jets, the equivalent of one day does not include the production rate of the weekend! Although this report there is an element of exaggeration, but it shows that the U.S. military giant, a large number of applications has been “flexible” manufacturing technology, it is impossible to make such a terrible speed.

Establishment of a “soft” advanced weapons manufacturing system, not only to break the Western countries in advanced machine tools and other automated manufacturing equipment on the monopoly, but also in artificial intelligence, intelligent sensor technology breakthrough. No advanced manufacturing system, even in the single technically advanced weapons system production rate, process will become

To drag a fatal “short board.”

Tags: ,

Sino-US confrontation does not match the strategic interests of both sides

Jul 9

Posted by admin in China, Observers, U.S. Military, United States | Comments off

Washington aircraft carrier 214x300 Sino US confrontation does not match the strategic interests of both sidesUnited States, “World News” editorial: clamoring for a moment the United States Han Huanghai joint anti-submarine exercises will commence shortly, participation in the exercise of U.S. nuclear aircraft carrier George Washington, USS Michigan are being put in place, while China is facing tremendous pressure has also introduced the no sit in the Chinese coastal waters of the US-ROK joint military exercises, combined with Russia in the Sea of Japan launched the “Oriental 2010 military exercise,” the Chinese live-fire exercises in the East China Sea, China made it clear to the South China Sea into the core interests of a sudden, around the Asia-Pacific waters paranoia. In a number of maritime disputes in the Multimodal storm brought the most intense play.

U.S. and South Korea must recognize that the Chinese Yellow Sea affects the sensitive nerves, modern China’s maritime humiliating setback is from the Yellow Sea began. Everyone knows, involved in today’s East Asia, Northeast Asia, all major countries complicated the situation, not to war, not peace, but so often in the current military exercises at sea, and caused public opinion to a high degree of concern caused by the enormous impact of States of the political situation, In this case, the accidental discharge of a crisis, countries can not detect.

How can I ease the situation? Very simple and U.S. in addition to empathy, mutual understanding of each other’s position and situation, the need to find a solution to the problem. The rise of China’s maritime power, Japan and South Korea, Australia and ASEAN, “tension”, the so-called C-encirclement is not groundless, the same as a world power, China, in order to protect their own national forces must also develop a strong navy, but neither reason for confrontation in the Yellow Sea, because it does not deserve, nor the strategic interests of both sides.

Tags: ,