Indian public opinion has hot Sino-Indian relations, which stress factors speculation. The following are excerpts related to the contents of report:

Indian media: India to deal with China that the “core interests”

Analysis of the Indian Institute of Defense Web site on September 3 article in question: China’s high-risk bets, India (Author: Su Yite – Dutta)

Be regarded as potential rivals for the country, the Chinese like to let the other party shall not be quiet. It is a way to deal with India in recent years to clearly reflect this. In general, this can be described as Sino-Indian relations since the founding of the People’s Republic in 1949 the theme. Beijing Declaration through this volatility: the world is not peaceful, that India is not the restoration of peace dismissed.

Northern Command B · S · panchashwar for visa indicates that China will continue to find new excuses can be made of India have been locked in conflict further complicated. At the same time, the PLA is in Pakistan-controlled Kashmir to strengthen road and railway construction, it seems that the Chinese did not think this is disputed areas.

New Delhi’s policy-makers clearly all. They have been downplayed over the past decade these issues in order to deepen the exchanges through the impact of the attitude of China’s most senior leaders, so that the rigid relations began to pick up. Unfortunately, it backfired.

If the liberal politicians think that, given the increasingly close trade relations between the two countries, trade volume reached 60 billion U.S. dollars – mainly exports to China, but also because of China’s construction, electricity and telecommunications companies have 25 billion U.S. dollars with India -300 100 million U.S. dollars in commercial contracts, China’s stance on key issues may be a slight relaxation, then they will be disappointed.

In the territorial dispute, China’s attitude is not the slightest concession. Dealing with international trade and environmental issues that officials have to pay if found on both sides form a “united front” of the foundation, I believe this will benefit the bilateral relationship, then they will be disappointed.

Many of China’s desire: it wants India to return “Arunachal Pradesh” (that I hid the South East – newspaper Note) – at least the Tawang and other areas; it wants India to Dalai Lama sent Back to Beijing, good for the Tibetans to suppress his freedom and the struggle of Tibet’s autonomy;

It would like to continue to occupy by force the occupation of Ladakh region of its; it wants to remain neutral in Nepal; it does not want close ties between India and the United States; it hopes to further open the Indian market, domestic enterprises; and so on.

It concludes that India has not done enough, and dissatisfaction, it will continue to put pressure on China:

It is opposed to India becoming a permanent member of UN Security Council to oppose the World Bank and International Monetary Fund as “Arunachal Pradesh” to provide loans for development projects,

It is hoped that India out of the East Asia process, which Pakistan denies India’s legitimate sovereignty over Kashmir, which the military stationed in Tibet, steadily building it through the pressure of maintaining strategic alliance with Pakistan.

India has two unilateral concessions to the Chinese. It first acknowledge that Taiwan is part of China, and then again did not seek concessions of its own territorial integrity of the case You Li accepted the Tibet part of China.

As the Chinese do not view them as concessions to India’s diplomatic stance that has not been any diplomatic rewards. India failed to give the Chinese recognition of India’s territorial order, recognition of Jammu and Kashmir and the northeastern border SAR (“Arunachal Pradesh”) owned all of India.

Although India has repeatedly reiterated that Tibet is part of China but did not receive any reciprocity from the Chinese, it does not help build confidence.

Nan of this, India must adjust the current strategy. As the importance of Sino-Indian relations, contacts and balance remains on the bilateral and regional stability. India also needs to show that its “core interests.” The need for more extensive measures to ensure that the dispute between the parties with a series of complex held extensive dialogue, eventually come to a solution.

India must insist on all diplomatic issues are the principle of reciprocity. Unilateral concession is of no use. In addition, India needs to improve relations with Taiwan-level, ministerial delegations invited to come for trade and investment negotiations.

India should be related to Southeast Asian countries – such as Indonesia, Vietnam, Philippines, Singapore – as well as Japan and the United States met to discuss parts of China in Asia’s arbitrary behavior, will help.

These countries are in a stable and harmonious China say one thing and worried about the issue.

Finally, in Beijing for “Arunachal Pradesh” and the Jammu and Kashmir as Indian territory, the Indian should stop claiming the Tibet Autonomous Region is part of China.

India-China relations to improve, maintain long-term stability is very important for India and Asia. But China also must have the same understanding.

India News: India, “the possibility of increasing the Cold War”

“Hindustan Times” website reported on September 5 issue: the question of Chinese privately India

Explore the views of India from China are usually bound to come from outside of China.

The Lu a document on the relations between India and China, the latest papers Hawaii Research Center on Asian security expert from India and China. View on how China, India, some of his views as follows:

China regards India as an irreconcilable social – religious divisions of land, with inherent instability and weak government leadership, can easily be contained by an agent, such view exacerbated tensions between the two countries .

Beijing to India’s rise as an economic and military power as the continued U.S. hegemony in Asia, hindered the end of U.S. hegemony in the Asia-Pacific region after the establishment of China-centric regional order.

China’s dominance in Asia, the long-term development depends on weak countries dependent on China. The goal has always been that confrontation between India and China.

China hopes India may pose any potential future threat nipped in the bud. 60 years since the last century, the Chinese people always pursue the “containment of India” strategy.

Before 2005, China’s official media on the “1962 war issues to be addressed” all the words never mentioned the issue of Arunachal Pradesh.

The Chinese government or PLA’s official media has never been declared “the peaceful liberation of Tibet in 1950, is a part and not the complete” liberation, has not declared that “some areas are yet to liberate Tibet.”

Revert to old problems and create new disputes, so that the other party at a disadvantage, negotiations to increase their weight, which is known as China’s political trickery bargaining tactics. Discusses the work of China put forward the strategy: China economically and militarily more powerful, so it is also growing in India’s aggressive attitude.

People’s Liberation Army of China on the Korean Peninsula, Taiwan and India’s policy has always played an important role.

Now, we see that the PLA in Beijing, the South China Sea and Southeast Asia policy has played a similar role in self-confidence.

For the media subsidiary of People’s Liberation Army may begin attacking the hegemonic vision of India, some publications also suggest the benefits of confrontation.

Beijing believes that China’s development and gradually form a sea of hostile anti-China forces of Union (the United States, Japan, Vietnam, Australia, India), India’s strength of the weakest. Some hard-line Chinese military planners believe that: the next 20 years, in order to kill an Indian killed arrogance, a military showdown between the two countries.

Therefore, India, the “dangerous to live in the shadow of China’s ten years” began in 2011.

In Pakistan-controlled Kashmir, and Tibet to build new railway infrastructure projects, China’s goal is: if two rivals or the Indian subcontinent outbreak of war between China and India, these projects can support the Chinese and Indian military intervention action .

The real irony is that China and India may once again plunged into war in the future the only incentive is precisely half a century ago led to their border war broke out in 1962, the same reason. From Afghanistan to Burma, the Himalayas geopolitical crisis is taking shape.

India-China relations will continue to be competitive, intense, sometimes for endless negotiations and issues of mutual concern to the limited collaboration features.

The two sides will defeat the other party to take strategic measures to make it difficult to obtain advantages or expanding sphere of influence. Chinese analysts Dai Bing (voice) said: “Although the battle can not happen, but the possibility of the Cold War broke out between the two countries is growing.”

Tags: China, India, made in china