In recent months, the United States in the Google incident, arms sales to Taiwan and met with the Dalai Lama and so on, frequently took the lead after another step by step, wantonly crash China’s “bottom line” and undermine China’s national interests and national dignity, so that the US relations again into the “winter.” Through this series of events behind, it is easy to see American-style hegemony and painstaking manipulation tactics.
In mid-November last year, President Obama to “soft posture” to visit China, and the release of a number of “positive signals”, in the jointly issued the “China-US Joint Communique”, the upgrade bilateral relations to a “common response to the challenges partnership. ” Obama also braving the cold wind to board Badaling Great Wall, when a return to “hero.” People in this country atmosphere permeated with a sense of optimism that the United States between the interests of “common ground” too much, another will take care of each other’s “major concern”, “G2″ cohabitation times in the world has come. Unexpectedly, the Obama “lift knee” had left on the “fell out”, across the Atlantic came a discordant series of “tone” Doutou to the people throwing the “pot of cold water.” U.S. National Public Radio reported that the January 2, in trade, investment and exchange rates and other matters, it is foreseeable prospect of Sino-US relations “is more conflict, rather than more cooperation.” G8R super-camp military January 4, the United States, “Washington Post” published an article entitled “worried,” the article, fearing the US-China relations will hit rock bottom in 2010. The reason is intensifying Sino-US trade disputes and the approval of President Obama may be the beginning of arms sales to Taiwan, but also ready to meet with the Dalai Lama.
Right on cue, the new year, the United States wielded “fist” “about face” to play to China. January 12, the search engine giant Google Inc. Senior Vice President and General Counsel David. Multi-Ahmed, in order to give vent to dissatisfaction with China’s Internet censorship, deliberately wrote in the blog site “found from China against the company’s infrastructure, highly sophisticated and targeted attacks, leading to Google intellectual property theft “;” There is evidence that the main purpose of the attackers to enter China’s human rights of people e-mail account “;” We have decided not to continue to review the Google search results in China . ” Just a few hundred words of Bo-wen to express the meaning is very clear: First, the Chinese government supports innuendo “hacker attack”; 2 is to be “defender of human rights, freedom fighters.” It is this insinuation, so that U.S. officials were “more likely situation is that these attacks and the Chinese government has loose ties”, “excuse.” In fact, Google’s very clear, the network hacker attacks occur every day throughout the world, China is also a target for hackers is a victim of cyber-attacks, China’s law is strictly prohibited acts of hackers, but also to “review, filtration “unhealthy content on the network has made relevant provisions. Google in 2006 when the company entered China had a clear commitment to abide by Chinese law. Now back on its words, we should start with the Chinese government to “negotiate”, assumed a more aggressive look. “Google incident” came out, the U.S. politicians seem to find a “beating China,” “excitement,” thought of “network freedom” and “human rights person”, then U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, President Obama, personally stood up to China Government send a punitive expedition, launched an attack pressure, will the Internet as a tool for ideological struggle. January 29, the United States ignored China’s solemn representations, insisted announced a new wave of arms sales to Taiwan, including 60 Black Hawk helicopters and Patriot III missile system, two Osprey-class minesweeper, Harpoon anti-ship missile , Bo-Sheng command and control systems, the total amount of 64 billion U.S. dollars. Intended to incorporate Taiwan into the U.S. military’s Pacific theater control system to enhance Taiwan’s ability to resist the mainland’s military, encourage the arrogance of the separatist island and undermine our country’s core interests and hinder the process of peaceful reunification. February 18, that is our fifth day of the first month, when all the Chinese Guo Danian immersed in the festive and peaceful atmosphere of the time, Obama insisted on meeting with Dalai Lama at the White House, in the Chinese people’s heart, sprinkled with 1 “salt.” Within a short span of a month’s time, Google events, arms sales to Taiwan to meet with the Dalai Lama are the United States intended to make trouble for stirring up. The United States as an arbitrary “cowboy”, regardless of disregard, wielded fist, connecting towards the Chinese call. Yankee hegemonic behavior has aroused strong indignation of the entire Chinese people!
Quite interesting is that the U.S. “manipulation skills” as if through a number of carefully “rehearsal” and its “Kung Fu” has reached the depth of the “consummate” with it. Around the United States single-handedly provoked the incident a violation of China’s interests, the U.S. media, think tanks, the military, politicians turn their turns on stage, the show supernatural powers, “tacit understanding.” “Google incident,” first be Google’s senior vice president of David. Multi-Ahmed, wrote in the network media, stirred up, “broke the news,” and then the U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton clearly stated publicly “network freedom” stance, Obama then asked the Chinese “explain.” U.S. arms sales to Taiwan, in essence, the interests and arms dealers to the U.S. strategy of containment against China. The United States first be well-known think tank the Rand Corporation and “assess” the mainland has been thrown across the Taiwan Strait military “tilting” and the only arms sales to Taiwan in order to “maintain cross-strait military balance” the conclusions in advance for the United States arms sales to Taiwan and the to test the mainland’s “response.” RAND Corporation and to be able to “forecast” to: In order not to provoke the mainland, this “arms sales to Taiwan in the list may not be requested by Taiwan F-16C / D fighters.” Arms sales to Taiwan after the announcement, and indeed with the Rand Corporation think tank’s “estimate,” exactly the same. Meeting with the Dalai Lama issue, the U.S. media propaganda machinery manufacturing public opinion, said Obama created a “first year in office served as the president did not meet with the Dalai Lama precedent”, and implies that Obama has “given enough,” the Chinese “face “Obama met with the Dalai Lama used to, above reproach. As early as the Dalai Lama arrived in the United States before the U.S. media will “pay attention” to the White House’s “low-key.” US media reported that Obama intends to address the election will meet the West Wing at the White House Map Room, rather than a symbol of presidential power in the Oval Office. White House spokesman Robert Gibbs on Obama, after meeting with the Dalai Lama stressed: “This is the president and the White House meeting with the team think that the best place.” The U.S. media “can pinch will be counted,” not only “objective” reporting of events that have taken place, but also able to “accurately predict” has not yet happened, simply spirits. Obama met with the Dalai Lama, the U.S. military “smart” with the. February 17, that is, the first day of Obama meeting with the Dalai Lama, the U.S. nuclear aircraft carrier “Nimitz” battle group arrived in Hong Kong, more than five thousand officers and men in Hong Kong “stay” 4 days. “Nimitz” aircraft carrier, the U.S. Stars and Stripes fluttering in the breeze. The flight deck, nearly a hundred fighter planes neatly parked there. Armed guards patrolled the deck at all times maintain a high degree of vigilance. “Nimitz” aircraft carrier moored in the sensitive period in Hong Kong, the U.S. media “surprise” to not “read,” Is it fear of tingling of the Chinese people “nervous”? Because they believe that the Chinese people will not forget two years ago, the “Kitty Hawk incident.” November 19, 2007, the Chinese government refused to ratify the reasons for multi-”Kitty Hawk” to Hong Kong. Very angry after the U.S. government openly incited “Kitty Hawk” aircraft carrier battle group and triumphantly return flagrantly pass through the Taiwan Strait. And in passing through the Taiwan Strait, the assumed “combat stance” – carrier-based early-warning aircraft off guard, fighter Luekong fly naked protest to the Chinese government. Over the years, Americans seem to associate numbers of China’s diplomacy response to “Pulse”: the face of the United States, often provocative, and only parry our blows, there is no backhand of the force, diplomatic protests also dry in a few less “stereotyped” and there is no really been taken to the United States feel “pain” of the counter-measures. Everyone in the face of this “unpleasant” incident, the U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton took advantage of his opportunity to argue that the Pacific countries: “I hope we (the U.S.) can have a mature relationship to deal with the differences between the two countries. This means that we relationship and because of our disagreement does not deteriorate. ” Attempts to the increasingly tense Sino-US relations, “cool” and then counting on China to North Korea, Iran nuclear, Afghanistan, and some global issues with the U.S. action.
Recently, the U.S. Undersecretary of State Steinberg and the White House National Security Council senior director for Asian affairs, arrived in Beijing to visit Bader, “trying to repair the” damage Sino-US bilateral relations. Crowley, the U.S. State Department spokesman, said, “Beijing and Washington need to set aside their differences, from the Taiwan and Tibet issues to the Internet free and the RMB exchange rate and so on, hand in hand to move forward.” Words are still ringing in our ears, the U.S. State Department recently issued the interference in China’s internal affairs, “Human Rights Report” on China’s human rights situation in making wild accusations. With regard to China’s “military power” and the Chinese “currency manipulation report” is said about “baked.” Google is again “fermentation temperature,” according to Reuters, the U.S. Google CEO Eric Schmidt said the March 10, Google and the Chinese government’s censorship and hacker attacks, the negotiations will soon bear fruit. On the same day, Anna Wong, vice president of Google in the U.S. House of Representatives Foreign Affairs Committee hearing, reiterated that Google do a good job of preparing to cease operations in China. She claims that, Google will no longer be subject to review for Chinese search content filtering, “even if this option will lead us to close Google.cn Chinese search engine, leave the Chinese market.” Meanwhile, the U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency recently released an assessment report said that the level of Taiwan’s fighter behind has affected Taiwan’s actual combat capability. There have been comments that the United States this is the place of export wind of their intention to sell Taiwan F-16C / D fighter aircraft. High-profile China-US trade friction will also continue to be staged in order to implement the State of the Union speech, Obama declared “national export action” – not only the next five years, doubling the U.S. exports, and create 2 million jobs plan. It seems that this year’s Sino-US relations is bound to be conflicts, trapped in a “trough” in a difficult year. The next step the United States is “seasoned” political manipulation “routines”, or a new guise, what is the “new drama” staged? We can only wait and see!
Archive for March, 2010
For a long time, India has been actively developing strategic nuclear forces, Dream “hegemony in South Asia.” Since 1983, began implementing the “Integrated Guided Missile Development Program” has successfully developed the “Prithvi” and “Fire” in two series of ballistic missiles.
In addition, in February this year, land and naval exhibition in New Delhi, the Indian army openly stated that in India, near the border between India and Pakistan could carry out the deployment of additional long-range precision strike missions, the “Brahmos” -2 ultra sonic cruise missiles, and hinted that more than the power of such missiles and similar weapons in China and Pakistan.
“Brahmos” -2 is still the core technology research and development stage belonging to the Russian
In order to meet the Indian Army attacked the ship and the demand, India’s Defense Research Development Organization in the “Brahmos” cruise missile, based on the continued development of “BrahMos” supersonic cruise missile development -2. The missile on December 22, 2004 launched the first test.
Professor of the Second Artillery Command College Senior Colonel Shao Ling interview In an interview with reporters, said Ben Wang, “Brahmos” -2 can only say that research and development stage, but did not successfully developed. Have been successfully developed is the “Brahmos.”
“Bula” refers to India’s Brahmaputra River, “Moss” is taken from Russia’s Moscow River. This is a supersonic anti-ship cruise missiles.
Supersonic anti-ship cruise missiles and cruise missiles on the general meaning is different. In a general sense of the cruise missiles, such as the U.S. “Tomahawk”, China’s “sword -10″ are to subsonic flight, a range of more than 1,000 kilometers, using a turbo-fan engines. Some are subsonic anti-ship cruise missiles, using the turbo-fan engine; supersonic rocket engine is used is also a flight within the atmosphere, the speed very quickly.
“Brahmos” is a supersonic anti-ship cruise missiles, there are several models, such as ship-launched and air-launched and land-launched. Supersonic anti-ship cruise missiles, fuel-consuming, it actually could only handle a range of 300 km.
As the “BrahMos” is a use of supersonic anti-ship cruise missiles, rocket engines, Russia accounted for technology components were relatively large proportion of the core technology is still part of Russia, and India is mainly involved in the development of some software.
India is already equipped with the “Brahmos” cruise missile, but Russia did not use, because Russia has better weapons and equipment. India is not satisfied on this point, because Russia, as developed countries are not equipped with their own words, is bound to affect “Brahmos” exports.
Core Tip: According to Japan’s “Sankei Shimbun” quoted on the 21st of Canada, “Han and the Defense Review,” 4 monthly reports that China’s Laiwu City, Shandong Province, has deployed a range of coverage in Japan’s medium-range missiles and missile forces. Reported that the Canadian “Han Dynasty and the Defense Review,” also published information from the source of a Chinese troop deployment facilities satellite photos, and accordingly speculated that the Dongfeng 21 ballistic missiles.
According to Japan’s “Sankei Shimbun” quoted on the 21st of Canada, “Han and the Defense Review,” 4 monthly reports that China’s Laiwu City, Shandong Province, has deployed a range of coverage in Japan’s medium-range missiles and missile forces.
Reported that the Canadian “Han Defense Review” (hereinafter referred to as “Han Dynasty and”) has also published information from the source of a Chinese troops are deployed satellite photographs of facilities. Report was based on photos to speculate that China is the deployment of a range of 1800 kilometers of medium-range ballistic missiles, “East Wind 21.” “Han and the Defense Review,” said that if the message is true, the missile’s range can cover most of the Japanese archipelago of military bases.
“Han and the” also analyzed that China decided in 2005 that new deployments. The deterioration was due to cross-strait relations, China’s deployment of missiles across the Taiwan Strait in order to strengthen the response to war to prepare for attacks on U.S. bases stationed in Japan power. China’s strategic nuclear missile force, “the Second Artillery” in Shenyang, Liaoning, Anhui, Huangshan, etc. have major bases in Jilin Tonghua is also Japan’s medium-range missiles into the radio industry.
Recently, Professor Liu Mingfu “China Dream” has been much discussion. The book’s main point the author July 30, 2008 The “Global Times” has been described before, this is “to catch up with the world’s most powerful nation to build a world-class army, with first-class military power”, to “The final winner country, opening up of China era.” As a soldier, the author wants the state to have the most powerful military is understandable, but these arguments are flawed.
First of all, if the “China model” includes the end of “a strong military power the world” the content, then it is not a good model, but a model of hegemony, is the old model of power politics.
In modern times, people have habitually existing state of the West as China’s modernization goals. Want to do first-class military power, the rise of the idea of really what the United States to pursue a goal? In the future assume the role of the United States today, which is not in line with China’s understanding of the future world will not become China’s pursuit of reality.
China’s pursuit of “domestic harmony”, “international peace”, but when you play up the military power to enter for the first number, your “benevolent”, “kingly,” “peace”, “No tyrant”, which Others believe it? “China model” will thus lose the attractiveness of the world.
To our world as a cut-throat arena, this concept exists in the United States who believe in power politics and military strategy in the minds of planners. “Arena theory” has a great influence, but the international political context of the United States can not serve as we observe the world and thinking framework, China has begun a harmonious enlightenment, should have the confidence and patience to really set up a smash arena theory.
Second, the composition of those resources is the national power need to treasure. If the United States feels there is sufficient money to play a global role, it may wish to continue to do so, never become champions. China is not necessary on military forces and the U.S. decision to Gao Xia.
What is a world-class? If not keep up with the United States, it can not be considered first-rate; if catch up with or overtake the United States, it would be what kind of world? The United States, the world’s total military spending nearly 50% of the total military spending, China will build “first-class military power,” it was how much economic resources? In the next world, even if there is such an economic capacity, we have such needs?
China should go beyond the historical tragedy of abused, with a higher wisdom to open up their own road to recovery. The Soviet Union into the hands of the military above the national prestige, the results are adversely affected by the huge arms. The U.S. military at its peak, the fact that the country was sliding into recession, to the contemporary world is even more instructive.
On the contrary, the building of China’s military has long maintained its own character, which is to rely on a certain threshold of physical military strength, through a rational foreign and defense policy and military doctrine to achieve national security objectives. China should continue to follow with limited military power to achieve the purpose of strategy. Even if the full emergence as a world power after the show to the world that it still should be their own economic success and cultural impact of the development model is to provide the world with “non-war”, “harmony” of the ideological model, but not the “first-class military force,” emphasize their prestige.
Third, the future world must be a world of cooperation, China should be aware of their respect for the future world should also contain some of the expense of its interests in exchange for the contents of the interests of global citizens.
Globalization has put growth, employment and social well-being interdependent on the basis of place. Benefit from such an open world system, China’s use of global markets for the country’s development. So that geo-politics of their most threatening the U.S. and Japan at the same time became the largest economic partner for the restoration of the rich history of the most civilized place in the world to create a lasting and peaceful environment. This is undoubtedly the right strategy, China’s future development will continue to be a continuation of this strategy and strengthened.
World of the future will be a cooperative world. With the “emerging country”, and their economic takeoff will eventually extend to the political and military aspects, the future of China’s military can not achieve the advantages of the United States today. Is that China’s economy to catch up with the United States, we can only be multi-polar world in one.
China will undoubtedly become a world power, international organizations, international order is also bound by the rise of China to change. China’s future role can not be like the United States, as did Hong Kong’s “consistent with U.S. interests.” Great powers not only to safeguard the interests of their country of individuals, but also have the ability to lead a number of countries together to meet the challenges of the world’s difficulties and to benefit everyone. China should be a leader in this new type of internationalism. (The writer is president of Lianyungang Development Institute)
Related News: National Defense University professor suggested that the Chinese do the world’s number one military power in the
Abstract: According to British media reports, China’s National Defense University professor Liu Mingfu in the book “Chinese Dream” in the proposal that China should build the world’s most powerful military power, compete with the U.S. “champion country.” Liu Mingfu saying it is China’s 21st century goals, and that if it can not become the world’s number one power, China is necessarily a backward country is an obsolete state.
Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, a military analyst, said a modern face of China’s growing military power in Southeast Asian countries have increased investment in national defense and procurement. Compared with the past five years, Indonesia, Singapore and Malaysia are imported weapons between 2005 and 2009 respectively, growth rate increased by 84%, 146% and 722%.
A report from the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute’s report on the security situation in South Asia, causing the relevant foreign media reports. British “Financial Times” reported that China’s military rise, the South Asian countries have increased their armaments, large-scale imports of modern weapons. The Reuters news agency predicts that due to recently discovered in the South Hey marine resources, making the conflict broke out between the countries concerned the possibility of greatly increased dramatically in some countries to buy modern weapons, but also neighboring countries and even caused a chain reaction throughout the region.
Britain’s “Financial Times” published on March 15 article said that the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) Arms Transfers Project senior research fellow Simon – Weizmann Institute (Siemon Wezeman) Military analysts have warned that China is growing modernization of military forces, neighboring Southeast Asian countries have increased investment in national defense and procurement. In recent years, some Southeast Asian countries in recent years, “substantial” to buy advanced submarines, fighter jets and long-range missiles, its aim is to possible future rainy day conflict in the South China Sea, the region’s territorial disputes are likely to evolve into a war. He said: “Although the Southeast Asian countries have not publicly expressed concerns about China’s military buildup, but they are thought to this issue, and are used to purchase advanced weapons and ways to express their position. 15 years ago, in the South China Sea, the same conflicting time, these countries do not have the ability to compete. Now, if someone in the area and attack these fields, things will become very dangerous. ”
Many Southeast Asian countries because of the armed forces resigned to the 1997 Asian financial crisis led to the situation of military equipment behind the building, in the recent economic upturn began to have to buy arms. According to the article, although these countries to buy advanced weapons from the driving force is the domestic, regional and more strategic considerations, most national governments, and not directly by name China as a direct target.
News from the Reuters news agency that, among countries in Southeast Asia during the past five years, a substantial increase in imports of arms movements that may threaten the security and stability in the region. Indonesia, Singapore and Malaysia was more intensified arms imports surge in the surrounding countries and even an arms race in the entire region.
Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, the article quoted cloth reported that compared with the past five years, Indonesia, Singapore and Malaysia are imported weapons between 2005 and 2009 respectively, growth rate increased by 84%, 146% and 722%. Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, Asia expert Simon – Weizmann Institute in the report, said: “The current wave of Southeast Asian countries, procurement of weapons, may endanger stability in the region, undermining decades of peaceful situation.”
In the Republic of Singapore Navy, recently revealed that there are indications that terrorist organizations are planning attacks on oil tankers in the past, after the intelligence, Singapore, Malaysia and Indonesia this month, strengthened its presence in major shipping channels maritime patrols of Malacca. The think-tank, said the three countries to increase procurement of long-range fighter jets and warships, but also on neighboring countries had an impact on arms procurement plan. The International Institute for Strategic Studies in Singapore, Tim – Aldous Huxley (Tim Huxley) that Singapore is concerned about the changes in regional balance of power caused by the impact.
It is reported that Vietnam last year to buy more modern long-range fighter jets and submarines. Singapore, the ASEAN member countries since the Vietnam War after the end of the first member of the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute has also been included in top ten arms importing nations. As international security, arms control and disarmament to conduct independent research body, the Swedish study said the global arms transfers, five years, an increase of 22%, with Asia and Oceania accounted for 41% of the total.
The article said that the United States remains the world’s largest exporter of military equipment during this period of overseas arms sales accounted for 30%. The United States nearly 40% of arms exports to Asia and Oceania, the proportion of exports to the Middle East is close to 40%.
Venezuela to receive the first batch of China’s K-8W trainer, which can be attached ground missile
Mar 16
According to the Russian military-industrial complex Web site March 15 reported that Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez has signed on the 13th of this month to receive the first batch of four Chinese-made K-8W trainer to the Order. The K-8W can be equipped with air to surface missiles, free-fall bombs and guided weapons.
Chavez received the new trainer for the ceremony held to announce, this group of K-8W for the Venezuelan Air Force has a tremendous sense of history and anti-imperialist, helping Venezuela’s military to defend the country’s sovereignty.
However, Venezuela did not reveal from the China National Aero-Technology Import and Export Corporation bought these trainers a specific price.
China National Aero-Technology Import and Export Corporation head of the medium-term in Venezuela last year announced that it will deliver in the K-8W trainer within three years of providing a package of material – technical support, and will also be used in life-cycle of these trainers to provide maintenance period maintenance services.
K-8 by the China National Aero-Technology Import and Export Company, Nanchang Aircraft Manufacturing Company and Pakistan jointly developed the company from south to fly as a basis for design and manufacture of advanced jet trainer, but also the first Chinese co-operation with foreign research and development, in order to export to Lord of the trainer. The aircraft is equipped with modern avionics systems, including instrumentation, communications and navigation equipment, to meet the 21st century pilot training. The aircraft has a strong capability of sustained flight with a maximum flying speed of 800 km, combat radius of 400 km and a maximum range of up to more than 2100 km endurance more than 3 hours. K-8 both for the A-5 attack aircraft or F-5 fighter aircraft like the provision of basic training, but also for US-made F-16 advanced fighter planes like to provide advanced training.
K-8 of the load of bombs up to a ton, when used as a combat aircraft, which is equipped with a 23 mm caliber guns, can also be mounted two air to air missiles, bombs or rockets, for airports to be places air defense operations. In addition, it also can be installed photographic and electronic scanning equipment, an air reconnaissance missions.
So far, K-8′s output has exceeded 500, of which some was also exported to some countries in Asia and Africa.
Chavez had previously said that Venezuela will buy a number of radar systems to China for the fight against drug smuggling. At present, the United States to block Venezuela from Brazil and Spain, access to technology, the use of a U.S. air surveillance radar system.
Need to be reminded that, Venezuela in 2006 Russia had also bought 24 Su–30 multipurpose fighter jets, 50 military helicopters and 100,000 AK-103 assault rifles, with a total value of up to 30 billion dollars.
